With urbanisation comes a distinct combination of benefits and drawbacks. This population shift is accompanied by economic expansion and industrialisation, as well as significant shifts in social structure and family life patterns. Increased stresses and factors such as an overcrowded and polluted environment, high levels of violence, and limited social support all have an impact on mental health.  The challenges are diverse and the entire population is affected by urbanisation.

Psychoses, depression, sociopathy, substance abuse, alcoholism, criminality, delinquency, vandalism, family dissolution, and estrangement are only a few of the diseases and deviancies linked to urbanisation. Given the wide range of health and wellness outcomes linked to environment exposure, the loss in nature experiences could be a direct cause to these difficulties. Exposure to nature has an important behavioural component with people choosing how often and how long they interact with the natural world.

Hence, people need a place where they can interact with nature and their inner self. Studies have showed that spending more time with nature and having a quiet place to meditate helps with a lot of physical and mental problems that one faces in urban lifestyle. Not the gardens, not the parks, but a space dedicated specifically to achieve peace of mind.

OBJECTIVE

Design a space for people to go to find inner peace. A place where they can interact with nature and meditate in peace. A space where one can find exposure to the environment. Craft a space where people can achieve their peace of mind in betweeen the hustles of their city lives.

• Aim is to provide a space for people to self therapise themselves or in small groups to keep up with the pace of urban cities.
• Outline a space which takes people away from their daily struggles and problems, and helps them in achieving their harmony.
• Incorporate spaces for therapeutic activities like meditation, yoga etc.
• Incorporate nature integrated/interactive solutions
• The space should work alike for people of every age group
• There is no site restriction
• There is no area restriction

REQUIREMENTS

• The Proposal to be presented on One Landscape Oriented A1 Sheet.
• Proposals can be presented using any technique of your choice ( Sketches, 2D Drawings, 3D Visualizations, Models, etc. )
• Team code (UIC) to be mentioned on the Top Right-Hand corner of the sheet.
• The proposal MUST NOT include any information (name, Organization, School, etc.) that may give away your identity.
• All text must be in ENGLISH, with a maximum of 150 words for project explanation.
• All dimensions should be imperial or metric units.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

NOTE:

A team can have up to 3 members.

The amount is non-refundable.

Late registered participants will receive 10 extra days for submission.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Anyone can participate irrespective of profession or qualification, and present their ideas. Participants can submit multiple entries but that would require multiple registrations.

A team can have up to 3 members.

TIMELINE

Registration deadline: 10th AUGUST 2022

Submission deadline: 15th AUGUST 2022

The submission deadline for all the participants who registered from 21st July to 10th August is 25th AUGUST 2022

Result announcement: 30th AUGUST 2022

*All the Deadlines are 23:59 IST (INDIA)

The following dates can be a subject of modification, if necessary.

SUBMISSION FORMAT

Submit in .jpeg format of file size not more than 5Mb.

Submit your entry at: submissions@arch8.in

The subject of the mail: Your UIC (XXXXX)

Name of the file uploaded: Your UIC (XXXXX)

PRIZES

Total cash prize worth 21,000 INR.

Winner: Cash prize of INR 10000 + Acknowledgement on our website and social media + publication of the participants’ interview (Video) on website + 40% discount on your next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

1st Runner-up: Cash prize of INR 6500 + Acknowledgement on our website + publication of the participants’ interview (Video) on website + 30% discount on our next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

2nd Runner-up: Cash prize of INR 4500 + Acknowledgement on our website + publication of the participants’ interview (Video) on website + 20% discount on our next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

10 Honorable mentions: Acknowledgement on our website + 10% discount on our next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

Participation certificate for all the participants.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

1. ORIGINALITY
2. CREATIVITY
3. INNOVATION
4. PRESENTATION

FAQs

1. What is the nature of the competition?

‘THE SOUL TEMPLE’’ is an open idea design competition challenge that is open for students, professionals & any individual with a creative mind.

2. Who can participate in the competition?

Architecture students, Architects, Interior Designer, Civil engineers & anyone with creativity can participate in the competition.

3. How many members can be a part of a team?

A team can have a maximum of 3 members. You can also participate individually.

4. Will every participant get a certificate of participation?

Yes, each registered participant will receive an e-certificate.

5. What should be done in case a payment mode is not available in a particular country?

In such a case, we request the participants to write about the issue at hello@arch8.in

to get other payment options. We will send all possible payment methods.

6. How will a team get its Unique Identification Code?

The Unique Identification Code ( UIC ) will be mailed to your registered e-mail address within 24 hrs after completing the registration process. There is only one UIC code for all the team members of a team.

7. What is the use of a Unique Identification Code?

All the participants are requested to use their UIC at the top right corner of your submission as it is your identity for the competition-related processes.

8. What to do if a participant does not receive the UIC after making payment?

In such cases, the participants are asked to mail their payment receipt hello@arch8.in.

9. Does the 150-word limit include legends & one-liners in the sheet?

No, the 150-word limit is for the proposal explanation only and it does not include the legends & one-liners on the sheet.

RULES AND REGULATIONS

1. In case you still have questions related to the briefs and the competition, please send them to hello@arch8.in
2. It is possible to amend or update any information relating to your registration including the names of team members once registered, mail us your query at hello@arch8.in.
3. Participant teams will be disqualified if any of the competition rules or submission requirements are not considered.
4. Team code (UIC) is the only means of identification of a team as it is an anonymous competition. Hence, a submission with its UIC will be disqualified from the competition.
5. The official language of the competition is English.
6. The registration fee is non-refundable.

PAST MEDIA PARTNERS

Scroll down to check the winning entries.

Top 3 winners:

1^st Prize:   José Gonçalves (Portugal)

2^nd Prize: Namish Jain (India)

3^rd Prize: Filippo Vajra &  Giovanni Ratto (Italy)

Honorable Mention

• Aum Gohil (India)
• Dana Ibrahim (Jordan)
• Mohamad Alamin Younis (Lebanon)

First Prize Winner: 

José Gonçalves (Portugal)

Second Prize Winner: 

Namish Jain (India)

A peace memorial is a contrast to a war memorial. Where a war memorial showcases a dreadful event of war in history, peace memorial on the other hand appreciates the state of contentment.
The approach of making this peace memorial has been through the passage of drastic events faced during a war or a conflict. The project marks the value and importance of peace by showcasing the aftermath of a war.
After independence the scenario of peace in India has worsened. We have been ranked 139th position among 163 countries in the global peace index 2020. The project tries to show the importance of peace as well as stands as the face for “India with Peace”.
To imagine such a project, a research on ‘memorial spaces and its user experience’ and multiple case studies of buildings such as: Peace memorial, Hiroshima; Yad Vashem, Israel, etc. have been done.
The conclusion of the research emerged that, though interaction between the memorial space and its occupant is emotionally impacted through various factors like sound, temperature etc. but its majorly through its form, material and light.
Now the case studies were achieved accordingly. Different spaces from these projects (interior and exterior) were studied and a certain pattern was analysed about the context, location, approach, zoning and the circulation on site and inside the structure, etc. Features such as radial approach, continuous & forced circulation, etc. have been carried forward to the design.
Keeping in mind that a site should have a great context; also people of the vicinity must know the outcomes of a war, Pokhran was considered the most suitable location for the project. It is the nuclear test site of India. The people of Pokhran are aware of the destruction and know that if a war breaks then it will be the end of humanity.
The project has been dealt with in such a way that maximum tourists can be attracted to the site. For this an illusion has been created. The site has been developed in such a way that it appears as if the site has witnessed a war.

The project tries to show that a visitor must experience numerous emotions through their journey. For experiencing the true value of peace a person has been taken through destruction, fear, anxiety, loneliness etc. of war. For this dark spaces have been created with angular walls, huge heights, narrow spaces etc. and even the landscaping is inspired from warscape with several monuments for the same.
The project incorporates several techniques such as windmills and solar panels to generate sustainable energy, spaces are submerged in the ground to make them cool and to make them more comfortable wind towers are also used which will also cope up with the extreme climate of Pokhran. Hence, these techniques make the project economically viable.
The project drives with the notion that after visualizing the torments of war an individual will realize the virtuous of peace and push the idea of a better world.

Jury Comments:

“A project that in its deep interpretation makes you reflect and excite through an architecture made of contemplative spaces that recount the atrocities and devastation of a war.”

“The idea of ​​creating this building has managed to overcome traditional standards, creating different experiences and routes in a building”

 

Third Prize Winner: 

Filippo Vajra &  Giovanni Ratto (Italy)

LA MEGALÓPOLIS DE NADIE

A research and a proposal for the occupation of Public Space in Mexico City
As reported by INEGI (InstitutoNacional de Estadística y Geografía), in the second quarter of 2018, in Mexico, about 30,500,000 people worked in the informal sector: these numbers show an increase of 3.3% compared to the same period of the previous year. In Mexico City, five out of ten workers belong to the informal sector, dedicating themselves to cleaning, construction, transportation and a multitude of services and commercial activities. Faced with this scenario, some deputies of the Morena party proposedto regularize more than 2,000,000 street workers. The municipality is also taking steps to raise millions of dollars to invest in public works.
This project proposal, based on field research, therefore moves in the direction of finding a compromise between the design of the public space and its occupation by the actors of the informal sector, considered not a problem for the city but rather a precious resource for the functioning of a complex metropolis. In fact, living the city on a daily basis, people have to face journeys that last up to an hour or more and during this time they are accompanied and come into contact with the dense network of products and services offered informally in a rapid and diffused way.
Following a systematic analysis of case studies found in the public space, therefore, the project for an urban infrastructure was designed in an area of the historic city center with a strong commercial identity.
The identified lot has a pre-existing simple metal roof built to accommodate a community of traders established in the area for several generations. The choice to intervene in this area was therefore dictated by the “non-virgin” nature place as a first mediation hadalready taken place between “top-down” logic and “bottom-up” processes.
Thanks to direct contact with users, it was possible to collect some of the dominant issues that were taken into account during the design: the result is a structure that works on more than one spatial scale trying to integrate attention to the context, enhancement of services and sustainability.
The project was thereforere solved in a modulated wooden structure to allow the circulation of common users and informal devices.
Through a series of simple space operations we have met the needs of users who have already been located for years in the area and further space has been set up for public activities, leaving a certain amount of “negotiable” space for random informal activities.
Working at multiple scales (infrastructure, architecture and design), we tried to create a variety of situations to make the project more flexible suggesting different uses.
The project is a lineal space with a certain variety of environments which host more fixed activities, others more occasional and widely offer new areas for socialization and leisure.
A certain attention was also given to the design of technological solutions to achieve easy maintain ability and the reduction of waste of the parts that would gradually deteriorate.

Jury Comments:

“Stimulating analysis of the relationship with urban space, interesting the typological schemes and the development of the idea, It was necessary to transmit a little more strength on urban and human connections and the well-being that a similar project would be able to give”

“Very complete analysis and proposed design result for urban problems”

 

Honorable Mention: 

Aum Gohil  (India)

APPARATUS OF AMUSEMENT

A retail for post consumption. Experimenting alternate productive relations to mindless consumption.
The trigger that started the enquiry for ‘Apparatus of amusement’ was through the understanding of the age of Anthropocene and the impact that humans have created on the surroundings through the commodified world we live in. Tracing the roots which have led up to this capitalist setting of the society, the factors affecting it and the consumerist strategies which leads to a numb state of mindless consumption by deciphering the epitome of consumerist typology of ‘shopping mall’. These extravagancies lead to the collective notion of excesses termed as ‘waste’.
Further, the study tries to map the end of life journey of an everyday object in an urban setting of Mumbai through understanding the formal excess network in Mumbai, role of the informal agents and the existing repurpose network.Now, what if we consider a point in transition from post-consumption till it gets considered as trash, the project offers alternate repurpose solutions for the second life of the objects categorized into household objects, fashion and electronics, and a proposed network of these post-consumption processes which informs the shortcomings of our primary system of waste management and the exceeded landfills.
These alternate systems are experimented in an existing retail setting of dysfunctional shopping mall, the Prime mall of Irla market street, the street has a vibrant retail character which fails to reflect when the typology of a mall is inserted in the scenario. While mapping the current use of the mall, it was concluded that 60 percent of the mall was not functioning and hence it needed programmatic injectors to create a life of the structure around it.
The project challenges to reverse the conventional notion of retail in a hyper-mediated urban setting which induces passivity in the consumers, by using the post-consumption objects in our ‘buy and discard’ society, oscillating roles of a consumer to provide radical solutions to move towards ‘circularity’
The project proposes at three scales Repurpose decentralized system which is alternative to the existing waste management system, Repurposing of the Prime mall and Irla street project intervention.The programmatic components include the wall of labour as protagonist intersecting the RCC grid, the apparatuses are devices which have simple machines and mechanisms where a process takes place. A role-player takes part in these apparatuses to perform a task which helps in repurposing. Some of the major programme include the event spacewhich records the reactions of role-players along with the leaderboards, the hall of experiments where the processes converge which then leads on to the labyrinth consumer’s playgroundwhere a calmer spacetakes you away from the hyper-real and the noisy street.
Furthermore, theproject tries to reframes the role of human in the social and ecological sphere as a shift in the current paradigm for decentralizing ways to manage our objects in our ‘buy and discard’ society.

Jury Comments:

“Very interesting and strong idea of organization of the spaces dedicated to the awareness of the concept of sustainable recycling. It would have been interesting to develop and strengthen a narrative of interactions between people and connected spaces with the same graphic character.”

“Excellent design that solves the problem raised. Good level of detail and expression of the sheet.”

 

Honorable Mention: 

Dana Ibrahim  (Jordan)

ADAPTIVE SOCIO-CULTURAL EPICENTRE.

It was a library and will always be but in another way. Libraries today have changed in many aspects, regarding the function, the use, and the form. It might be thought that libraries will disappear in the future and people will no longer use them. However, libraries aren’t important for only reading, but in being a fundamental function in the community and a true meaning of generations’ renaissance.
The project is a new representation of libraries in the MENA region, offered to all people without the need of using transportation. The project was inspired by a personal experience, as it was noticed that people in the MENA region can hardly go to libraries by walking, as it is far from their homes. In other words, libraries are not accessible to different categories of people such as children, elderlies, and people with disabilities. The project is divided into two main functions; the library and the cultural research centre that studies the cultural aspect of the site and supports the library.

The solution started from the site selection that was based mainly on the distance which the average person can walk without taking a rest and it was 1.6 km (between 15-20 minutes walking) to reach the site. The project started from Jawa, people in Jawa expressed the necessity of providing socio-cultural activities. In Amman, in general, there were many problems that people mentioned regarding the library and how it is not safely reachable by all people.
The definition of the project came from its two parts: the practical and the theoretical ones. The practical part -the public library- serves today as a contemporary culture library and it has the same function as the community centres. The theoretical part is represented by the cultural research centre and precisely studies the performance-oriented view of research culture that relies on quantitative measures and focuses on research outputs and their impact on the economy and society. When the two parts are combined with sustainable development principles –to serve future’s and today’s needs-, we have an adaptive socio-cultural epicenter. “Adaptive” came from the idea that the project will be adaptive to all sites that have the same issues. And “EpiCentre” came from the extreme use of sustainable principles of the design.

The project is based on its sustainable core – which is part of the library – that represents a flexible and enjoyable journey that the client will have in order to make the project active 24 hours. Moreover, it is the link between other functions of the design. When moving up, the noise become less increasingly. Mainly the project is designed in concrete and steel. Using different materials than those commonly used in Jawa in order to propose a new image and to bring attention and curiosity about the project.

Jury Comments:

“Interesting spatial and architectural organization of a new way of conceiving a library. It would be interesting to give more strength to the idea”

“Beautiful presentation. A building that very well solves socio-cultural needs integrated into the environment.”

 

Honorable Mention: 

Mohamad Alamin Younis (Lebanon)

TOWARDS THE METAMORPHOSIS OF THE LANDFILL:
TRANSFORMING GARBAGE DUMPS INTO PROACTIVE PARKS

Most cities around the globe follow a linear model in their operation: a flow of input/supply- be it energy, water, people, food, vehicles, and material – is processed and consumed resulting into an output flow of sewage, garbage, waste, and pollution. Such an unsustainable operation necessitates that every city designates a “backyard” to dispose of its output on a site that is out of its sight. The impact of such statement is seen at the social and urban level of most cities, where the public is totally absent in these highly industrial areas. It is safe to say that when the flow of the public is cut from the waste management sector, people are less likely to know about their anthropic actions. How could architecture change the way backyards are seen by people, and turn them into anchors for environmental awareness?

In this thesis, I have chosen the saturated dump of Tripoli, the city where I live. Located at the delta of the polluted city river, this backyard is composed of a 60,000 m2 garbage landfill with a volume of 3,000,000 m3, a centralized sewage treatment plant, a wholesale vegetable market, and a municipal slaughterhouse. Architecture design strategies must therefore answer: how is man meeting the machine in the context of sustainable design? As the metamorphosis of Tripoli’s waste disposal and flow systems takes 7 years to happen at the waterfront, various structural and environmental transformations happen on site. The project answers this question by dealing with 2 dimensions. The first dimension is the urban integration of the proposed program into the parcel. The project is made of 4 parts: the park, the solid waste management machines, the proposed research center, and the visitor center. What stands out the most in this urban strategy is the architectural embodiment of the visitor center’s path to rewire the flow of the public to all functions of the project. This path is crucial to raise awareness from start to finish. In other words, as people walk through the project, they observe the process of waste management from waste segregation at the sorting plant till waste disposal in the inaccessible parts of the park. The second-dimension deals with the project’s building technology to cut off nearly 80% of its electrical bill by extending the waste process to a further step. As biogas is released in the Co-Digestion by digestors, it is pumped to the biogas treatment plant where methane is extracted. When treating LFG in the LFG treatment plant, it is purified and then processed by reciprocating engines to produce electricity. The small power station generates around 150 kW/year, which is slightly more than enough to run the facility. As their connection to nature grows, so their connection to the park, which strengthen the public’s awareness and responsibility. Design strategies behind the project rendered the park a proactive and sustainable environment that aims at minimizing the ecological footprint across generations.

Jury Comments:

“Very interesting project from the conceptual point of view of developing a garbage dumps regeneration project and transforming it into a laboratory of sustainability and education about environmental impacts. It would be interesting to give more strength to the part of representation and construction of the idea.”

“Reached a good level of detail in the development of the building, an idea consistent with the problem.”

 

Shortlisted Entries:
1. Amit Imtiaz (Bangladesh)
Breathing Hydrological Infrastructure

2. Hélder Simões (Portugal)
The infrastructure is inserted and developed throughout the city and functions as a backbone of the entire plan aiming to solve problems from urban design to the precariousness of housing.

3. Sanath Thomas Samuel (India)
Algorithmic Design Process In Spatial Planning For A Winery In Nashik

4. Daniel Franco, Carlos Huerta & Ana Garrido (Mexico)
Void Dynamics: The Catalysts Of Succession.

5. Alanna Deery (US)
RE-Generate

6. Mitsuki Ikeda (US)
Peeling Architecture

7. Ramsha Nazir Malik (Pakistan)
Paiwand; architecture as a technique of “damage eviction” with basic concept of “grafting”

8. Francesco Ferraro (Italy)
New administrative centre of niandiwa – kenya

9. Tushar Mondal (India)
Autonomous Transhumance

10. Letizia Rollo (Italy)
“The inner of the external. A contemporary project for ragusa”

11. Nitika Goyal (India)
Architecture as a catalyst for story-telling: designing a na’vi settlement

9b9c97 d192fb4d91fc47f695cff79b496d4e81 mv2

9b9c97 d120308a87d8452e924028204ca52160 mv2

9b9c97 b0a61c3b80564eb1b55bc1320e5d1c39 mv2

9b9c97 b2278de5b88f4b11b94dccaed94062c4 mv2

9b9c97 c8f9d6ecbcec44e794574246223bf114 mv2

9b9c97 8eabefdee9944c8b850b3f6cc290dc73 mv2

9b9c97 32131f7842c84492a3fb89f1bf39f669 mv2

9b9c97 68600d0e5a0c432496dc7f00db60f4d7 mv2

9b9c97 4141b75223744ffb891a2366d7373120 mv2

9b9c97 70e2bc9b4d0b4b0f9cb3c1e1549a3976 mv2

9b9c97 7b3733e4f7f147fdb39083068834d10b mv2

9b9c97 8d7eecce731e437eb73d7c9307980d86 mv2

9b9c97 315d0f0056854d0883e1d08da26829db mv2

9b9c97 9c3ab3c2e2684d9cb31953dea56e6275 mv2

9b9c97 4d27b4934e584538a235cf09aede4c72 mv2

9b9c97 4dbfa9008af14211923679176238667a mv2

9b9c97 e0d32ae3972247e29b0abb4a657d58c1 mv2

9b9c97 ba7aae43c9b844d4a633f86e856f7494 mv2

9b9c97 0dbaae8b8e5c4334a73a96f4a4ce6c39 mv2

9b9c97 69794d3f88df42a1a99f654c1a1afbcc mv2

9b9c97 2eaa0cc115664394849ff435b4772c23 mv2

9b9c97 6561c300e3ef4185a57cd502bbdda889 mv2

9b9c97 bc61f7efae464b5bba28053574db02e8 mv2

9b9c97 ea0b4d904bc24d36a20239bbd4aaf242 mv2

9b9c97 0331685e09a7403d8253c32493b1a27b mv2

9b9c97 cdb4775be5b14989a7eab127f2d1175e mv2

9b9c97 172494b6bd304c3784e1553a783757f2 mv2

9b9c97 28eb29bb6a8344e5a71fc9d5ef5defa7 mv2

9b9c97 5bc98316e4d640e4ae960525f286cd5a mv2

9b9c97 ed9807a2e1944c8a80fd29d4bdf326c5 mv2

« ‹ 1 中 2 › »

 

Organiser:

Artuminate : https://www.artuminate.com/

Winners Announcement: https://www.artuminate.com/competition-winners/a4tc-2021

 

Contact:

• media@archiol.com
• hello@artuminate.com

Instagram:

• @archi_ol
• @architecture_competitions_

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/archiol.fb

Presentation skills are just as important as designing; one of the best mediums to present your architectural designs is through rendering. Architectural rendering aims to create life-like experiences of the buildings before they are built.

Rendering aids the designer to convey his or her ideas, an image that represents the designers’ imagination most realistically.

Create one rendered architectural graphic design that says it all. As this competition aims at exploring and understanding rendering (a medium of conveying designs) to an unimaginable extent, so you are free to choose the location, and scale of the residential project.

Why you should take this Challenge?

• To showcase – rendering skills.
• To challenge yourself to create a single image that represents your design thought process.
• To be able to create a single image that displays briefly and smartly a bundle of ideas.
• To present the idea of ‘Quality over Quantity’

“Design is thinking made visual.”

– Saul Bass

We expect:

A single rendered image of a residential architectural design.

Keywords: Gruha, Architectural rendering, 3D view.

• Gruha:GRUHA means HOME in sanskrit
• Architectural Rendering:The pictorial arts and of architectural design whose main aim is to show how they will look when completed, before buildings have been built.
• 3D view:you can see the potential scale and design of an architecture or interior design project.

“Visualization is an imagination which ends up into reality.”

– Louis I Kahn.

GUIDELINES / RULES

• Render a single image with 3d view/views of a home.
• Drawing requirements: 3 D view/views.
• Support your design with all possible explanations, (Formats that are accepted: Text, Video, Audio)
• The reasoning for the selected view/views.

*It is a rendering competition, so do not hesitate to ask questions in case of doubts email us at hello@artuminate.com 

(Subject: GRRC- Query | Body: Your query)

PARTICIPATION

• This competition is open to all. If you are a creative individual with ideas and wish to present your rendered ideas then take this challenge now!
• We welcome architecture university students to participate as representatives for their university and spread the word among fellow students. Please contact us for university discount codes.

*To know more about being representatives and benefits contact us at hello@artuminate.com (email subject: Representative volunteer)

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

• Presentation Board (01 | size: A1 Landscape format)
• Text Summary (Min. 300 words)

JUDGMENT CRITERIA

• Idea / Concept
• Quality
• Aesthetics
• Originality
• Material application

JURY

• To be announced.

TIMELINE

Registration deadline: 20^th November 2022

• AR (advanced registration): 12^thApril 2022 – 11^th May 2022
• ER(early registration): 12^thMay – 11^th June 2022
• SRL1 (standard registration level 1):12^thJune 2022 – 11^th July 2022
• SRL2 (standard registration level 2): 12^thJuly 2022 – 11^th August 2022
• SRL3 (standard registration level 3): 12^thAugust 2022 – 11^th September 2022
• SRL4 (standard registration level 4): 12^thSeptember 2022 – 11^th October 2022
• LR (late registration): 12^thOctober 2022 – 11^th November 2022
• CR(countdown registration): 12^thNovember 2022 – 20^th November 2022

Submission deadline: 22^nd November 2022

Result Announcement: 22^nd December 2022

Participants will be notified in case of an update in the timeline.

FEES

• AR (advanced registration): 4^thApril 2022 – 11^th May 2022 $100 (INT) / ₹2000(IND)
• ER(early registration): 12^thMay – 11^th June 2022 $110 (INT) / ₹2200(IND)
• SRL1 (standard registration level 1):12^thJune 2022 – 11^th July 2022$115 (INT) / ₹2400(IND)
• SRL2 (standard registration level 2): 12^thJuly 2022 – 11^th August 2022 $120 (INT) / ₹2600(IND)
• SRL3 (standard registration level 3): 12^thAugust 2022 – 11^th September 2022 $125 (INT) / ₹2800(IND)
• SRL4 (standard registration level 4): 12^thSeptember 2022 – 11^th October 2022 $130(INT) / ₹3000(IND)
• LR (late registration): 12^thOctober 2022 – 11^th November 2022 $150 (INT) / ₹3500(IND)
• CR(countdown registration): 12^thNovember 2022 – 20^th November 2022 $200 (INT) / ₹5000(IND)

*(INT) – International payments /*(IND) – Indian payments

PRIZES

• TROPHY

The top 3 entries will receive the bespoke trophy.

• PUBLICATION

News announcement on global platforms (platforms partnered with us – Global exposure.)

Design feature on our platform

• INTERVIEWS

Exclusive Interview in both text & video format (Video feature on our home page)

• ATTESTED CERTIFICATE

Certificate of achievement will be awarded to our winners / honourable mentions & a participation certificate to all our participants

• PUBLICATION OF ARTICLE / DESIGN

Design/article feature on our partnering platform.

• JURY CRITS / COMMENTS ON YOUR ENTRY WITH DETAILS

Comments from our jurors for improvement and appreciation.

*All the certificates will be attested and e-format

REGISTRATION:

Visit our website: www.artuminate.com

Click the competition banner: Gruha Rendering challenge –

https://www.artuminate.com/annual-competition/gruha_rendering_challenge

Scroll down to the bottom and click on the registration button

• International Registration:
  • https://www.archiol.com/product-page/gruha-rendering-challenge
  • https://www.artuminate.com/international-registration

• Indian Registration:
  • https://www.artuminate.com/product-page/gruha-rendering-challenge
  • Use Razorpay – Payment gateway in case you are unable to pay using PayU

ORGANISERS:

• ARTUMINATE – artuminate.com
• ARCHIOL – archiol.com

CONTACT:

• Doubts /Queries related to the competition: hello@artuminate.com
• Request online chat support for queries: DM (Instagram) @archi_ol (Team will redirect you the chat support)
• Payment related queries: media@archiol.com

(Once you receive a successful registration, it means that you have been registered).

● First Prize Winner_ Shruti Madhukar Teli
● Second Prize Winner_ Swapnil Biswas
● Third Prize Winner_ Madhulika Pandraj
● Honorable Mention_ Dana Ibrahim
● Honorable Mention_ Khyati Solanki
● Honorable Mention_ Ruiqi Xu

First Prize Winner_ Shruti Madhukar Teli

Second Prize Winner_ Swapnil Biswas

Third Prize Winner_ Madhulika Pandraj

Honorable Mention_ Khyati Solanki

Honorable Mention_ Ruiqi Xu

First Prize Winner

Second Prize Winner

Third Prize Winner

Honorable Mention 01

Honorable Mention 02

Honorable Mention 03

SHORTLISTED Entries 01

SHORTLISTED Entries 02

SHORTLISTED Entries 03

SHORTLISTED Entries 04

SHORTLISTED Entries 05

SHORTLISTED Entries 06

SHORTLISTED Entries 07

SHORTLISTED Entries 08

SHORTLISTED Entries 09

● First Prize Winner_ bothy, No.2121 Conservatory Park by Naiyue Zhang
● Second Prize Winner_ Round House by Gyu Jin Kim, Da Som Park & Hyeon chae Song
● Third Prize Winner_ House of Dwelling or Leisure by Yu Fu
● Honorable Mention_ BLUE HALO“THE OCEAN CALLS”
● Honorable Mention_ Blooming Ivy by Helen Cheung
● Honorable Mention_ Home 2121 by Hanwan Liang

First Prize Winner_ bothy, No.2121 Conservatory Park by Naiyue Zhang

 

Honorable Mention_ Home 2121 by Hanwan Liang

Home 2121 by Hanwan Liang

The houses people live in are too limited: all the spaces seem to have clear functions and purposes: the dining room is for eating, the living room is for watching TV, and the bedroom is for sleeping. Whether there is a form generated from the possibility: such a form is different from all the current geometric space. It does not come from the functional purpose, but from the result of the random expansion of the body. In such a collision process, the designer will add a certain geometric form, such as cube, to limit its expansion, resulting in a kind of conflict between complete randomness and complete purpose：the shape produced by the gray area between the two. Such a form may bring users a completely different living experience.

The design site is located in Chancheng District, Foshan City. The house is designed for the daily life of two families of seven. The designer defined the private space in the daily life of seven people, such as bedroom and bathroom, with a certain geometry: square. The rest of the public activity space produces an interactive space with random shape by doing the experimental research on the possible shape, trying to create a space experience different from the previous life. At the same time, the random shape also indicates the possibility of life.

Jury Comments:

“Beyond introducing an idea of orderly chaos, the concept could perhaps be a panacea in preventing degradation of the human condition – which is a fascinating idea. The idea of chaos could be a beneficial way of unravelling and revitalizing the quality of life while also removing the commoditized design of a uniform, identity-less format. ”

“The concept is focused on a different kind of living with different spatial qualities and different habits and the design fulfils those very well. The design process is very interesting and creative. The future isn’t specifically mentioned but hinted because of the entirely different living spaces. ”

First Prize Winner01

First Prize Winner02

First Prize Winner03

First Prize Winner04

First Prize Winner05

Second Prize Winner01

Second Prize Winner02

Second Prize Winner03

Third Prize Winner01

Third Prize Winner02

Third Prize Winner03

Third Prize Winner04

Honorable Mention A01

Honorable Mention A02

Honorable Mention A03

Honorable Mention A04

Honorable Mention05

Honorable Mention B01

Honorable Mention B02

Honorable Mention B03

Honorable Mention B04

Honorable Mention C01

Honorable Mention C02

Honorable Mention C03

Honorable Mention C04

献给撒哈拉沙漠。

世界上没有任何地方像阿拉伯大沙漠那样美丽。先知、财宝、失落的城市: 撒哈拉是超自然力量的聚集地，因为只有超自然力量才能生存在连贝都因人都拒绝去的地方。撒哈拉沙漠是探索停止的地方，是人类野心被否定，虚荣心被淹没的地方，因为沙漠无法被驯服，无法被理解或测量。沙漠只能在远处凝望，希望被无数次扬起的沙子所忽视，这些沙子夺走了它们自己的生命、文明和财富。 

在沙漠中，生活是不可能的，但在沙漠的边缘，有一些最深刻的经验，人可以体验。寒冷、炎热、寂静和沙丘的歌声，还有海市蜃楼、日落、星光灿烂的天空，尤其是郁郁葱葱的绿洲。

 生活在沙漠边缘是少数人的特权，而正是这种特权孕育了沙漠住宿。

沙漠住宿是 YAC 和 Jarir 发展公司的竞争项目，旨在探索当代建筑在最新和最令人印象深刻的自然圣地之前的潜力。

在这样一个极其荒凉的地方，什么样的款待才是最好的呢？为了回答这个基本问题，在纳兹高原上，设计师们将有机会在这个星球上最凶猛、最致命的沙漠大门口设计一个奢华的绿洲: 一个当代的绿洲，在这里，人们可以在棕榈树和果树的树荫下休息，享受无边无际的沙漠。在这里，你可以沉浸在凉爽的游泳池中，欣赏着日落映在白炽的沙滩上，或者，再次观察地平线上若隐若现的沙尘暴的轮廓，确定周围建筑的遮蔽。

因此，它是身体的避难所，但最重要的是，它是精神的避难所，因为绿洲和沙漠是对立的两个概念，它们涉及人类复杂性的整个范围，自那以后——正如沙漠游牧民族的一句古老谚语所说——”上帝创造了绿洲，使人类能够在那里生活，创造了沙漠，使人类能够找到自己的灵魂”。感谢将接受这一挑战的设计师们。

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

The aim of the competition, MINIMUM SCHOOL is to create a model sustainable school that creates a robust educational community in this remote area. The school shall be built on the foundations of local culture and architecture with an aim to provide high quality modern education. The school should celebrate and enhance Ladakhi traditions and establish a holistic educational and academic community.

The idea of a minimum school is built on the pillars of adaptability, modularity, and sustainability. The school should be built using minimum resources, shall have a minimum energy footprint and create minimum disturbance to the context.  The architectural aspect of the built form (volume, materiality and aesthetic features) should be (inspired from) the local vernacular building techniques. The school should possess the ability to sustain and support the fragile relationship between humans and natural ecosystems.

The school should cater to a small community and provide education to around 80-100 children from the vicinity. The age group can vary from kindergarten to 15 years with an aim to democratize education. Good architecture is price-less, not price-full. Architects should aim to maximize the aesthetic and efficiency potential of the minimum school and allow people to dream. It should liberate and uplift the people and make a powerful impact on the community.

PRIZES

Prizes worth EUR 2500 are up for claim with the distribution as follows:

FIRST PRIZE: EUR 1200

SECOND PRIZE: EUR 800

THIRD PRIZE: EUR 500

Apart from the winners, the jury will select ’10 Editors’ Choices’ who will be featured on our website and several other international magazines and websites across the world. The winners and Editors’ Choices will be provided with an honorary certificate.

REGISTRATION &TIMELINE

The competition is open to everyone in the world (architects, students, engineers etc.). You can participate individually or in a team. A team can have a maximum of three members only.

Standard registration: – 15th September 2021 – 15th November 2021

• For International participants: 60 EUR + Taxes (per team)
• For Indian participants: 1800 + Taxes (per team)

Late registration: – 16th November 2021 – 14th December 2021

• For International participants: 80 EUR + Taxes (per team)
• For Indian participants: 2100 INR + Taxes (per team)

Submission deadline: 15th December 2021

Result: 15th -18th January 2022

DISCOUNT

Group discounts apply for a minimum of 5 teams from one particular architecture school/university as our initiative to promote more participation from students. Send us the following details at queries@switchcompetition.com to avail the offer.

OTHER DETAILS

Website: www.switchcompetition.com

Facebook: www.facebook.com/switchcompetition

Instagram: www.instagram.com/switch_competitions

● First Prize Winner_ Dhruv Bhatia & Vasudev K Gaur
● Second Prize Winner_ Nidhi Khot, Laxaree Sawant & Neha Jayasanker
● Third Prize Winner_ Harika Gandi & Sarmada Madhulika
● Honorable Mention_ Rosa Estela Santi & Mario Blanco
● Honorable Mention_ Jiaming Cui, Zhuocheng Yu & Xiaoting Kuang
● Honorable Mention_ Ce Sun, Zhaojun Pan & Shien Jiang

First Prize Winner_ Dhruv Bhatia & Vasudev K Gaur

Concrete in Architecture: Figure & Ground

By Dhruv Bhatia & Vasudev K Gaur

Dhruv Bhatia

I am Dhruv Bhatia, a 19 year old Architecture student at School of Planning &Architecture, Bhopal, India currently in my third year out of the five-year major. Born and brought up in New Delhi, the capital city of India, I have been fortunate enough to experience the diversity of cultures, art and architecture. I am a keen observer who believes in developing frameworks that define design approach and integrates every aspect of human life. As an admirer of the heritage, I believe in finding a comprehensive solution to preserve what now has become a door to the past.

Vasudev K Gaur

I am a 3rd year Architecture student at School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal. I firmly believe that architecture is synonymous to long term commitment to exploring and learning; and that those who consider it merely as creation of spaces occupying volumes never understood the essence of this major. I am of the opinion that the more demanding the client is or the elaborate the design problem is; the more absorbing its design process becomes and the more appealing the building turns out to be. Writing has always been a pastime for me, and inspecting & writing about the innovative prospects in the field of the construction fascinates me furthermore. As a future architect, my goal is to bring socially expressive and thought-provoking structures to life.

Read the article on www.archiol.com

Second Prize Winner_ Nidhi Khot, Laxaree Sawant & Neha Jayasanker

The Archipelago of Concrete

By Nidhi Khot, Laxaree Sawant & Neha Jayasanker

Neha, Nidhi & Laxaree

We are students of 3rd year of B. Arch at Rachana Sansad’s Academy of Architecture in Mumbai, India. Writing has always been a creative outlet for us, and we believe it is a powerful tool of expression. We aspire our words to be strong enough to induce a spark in this world and create a niche for ourselves.

Read the article on www.archiol.com

Third Prize Winner_ Harika Gandi & Sarmada Madhulika

A Concrete Belief

By Harika Gandi & Sarmada Madhulika

Harika Gandi

My name is Harika, I am an Architect, Artist and Professor with over 5 years of experience working closely with Architects, Artists, International experts, policy makers & students across the country. I graduated in Bachelor of Architecture from Andhra University and earned my Masters’ degree in Psychology from Andhra University. Being a continuous learner, I am currently pursuing my Masters in Environmental Design from JNAFAU, Hyderabad.

Besides being the co-founder of the firm Sargah Architects, my true passion for working with young learners, sharing knowledge, and interacting with them has motivated me to pursue my career in teaching where I work as Assistant Professor at Sri Venkateswara College of Architecture, Hyderabad and Visiting Faculty at Sri Venkateswara College of Fine Arts, Hyderabad. My teaching philosophy is to create a community of learners who are design thinkers, who create sustainable solutions and are rooted to Human and Environmental centric designs, making this world a better place to live in.

Interview

SarmadaMadhulika Kone

An architect and urbanist whose work is inclined towards developing socially responsible design solutions. She worked on multiple residential towers in Navi-Mumbai, 2015-16. She is now the Founder and Principal Architect at Saṛgaḥ Architects, Hyderabad, India. She received her Master of Planning in Urban Development from Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, India in 2017 and a Bachelors of Architecture from the School of Planning and Architecture, Vijayawada, India in 2014. As an urbanist, her research interests are in People-centric Cities and ICT interventions in Participatory Planning. Her latest publication is “Smart Public Participation: An inquiry into the role of process and technology” in the book ICT Solutions for Improving Smart Communities in Asia, 2021.

Read the article on www.archiol.com

Honorable Mention_ Rosa Estela Santi & Mario Blanco

Concrete as a building material | SPA 2021 Nature’s Balance

By Rosa Estela Santi & Mario Blanco

Rosa Santi

An architect graduated with more than 10 years of experience in architectural design. I consider it important to look back and learn from our ancestors and the magnificence of the works and then incorporate that value into the present, generating a warm and comfortable environment to improve the quality of life.

Mario Blanco 

An environmentally concerned scientist who loves architecture as a way to influence human thought and responsible lifestyles.  He approaches the design of spaces from a poetic and psychological poetic point of view.  Growing up he wanted to study architecture but the lack of opportunities in this field at the time made him gravitate towards science and philosophy.

Read the article on www.archiol.com

Honorable Mention_ Prabowo Hanifianto

Concrete must Evolve

By Prabowo Hanifianto

Read the article on www.archiol.com

Honorable Mention_ Ce Sun, Zhaojun Pan & Shien Jiang

Innovations in chinese classical garden architecture

By Ce Sun, Zhaojun Pan & Shien Jiang

Read the article on www.archiol.com

Shortlisted Entries:
● 3D printing of concrete raw materials_Jiaming Cui, Zhuocheng Yu & Xiaoting Kuang
● Importance of concrete in architecture_Divya Brahma & Masirah Khan
● Reminiscing the Radicals to the Future | The Ribbon of concrete _Niharika Tare
● A dawn of never-ending possibilities__Shruti Teli

Organiser:
Artuminate : https://www.artuminate.com/
Winners Announcement: https://www.artuminate.com/competition-winners/concrete_in_architecture_2021

Contact:
● media@archiol.com
● hello@artuminate.com
Instagram:
● @archi_ol
● @architecture_competitions_
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/archiol.fb

First Prize Winner：Dhruv Bhatia Vasudev K Gaur 1

First Prize Winner：Dhruv Bhatia & Vasudev K Gaur 2

Second Prize Winner：Nidhi Khot, Laxaree Sawant & Neha Jayasanker 1

Second Prize Winner：Nidhi Khot, Laxaree Sawant Neha Jayasanker 2

Third Prize Winner：Harika Gandi Sarmada Madhulika

Honorable Mention：Rosa Estela Santi Mario Blanco 1

Honorable Mention：Rosa Estela Santi Mario Blanco 2

Honorable Mention：Prabowo Hanifianto

Honorable Mention：Ce Sun, Zhaojun Pan Shien Jiang 1

Honorable Mention：Ce Sun, Zhaojun Pan Shien Jiang 2

Honorable Mention：Ce Sun, Zhaojun Pan Shien Jiang 3

Shortlisted Entries1

Shortlisted Entries2

Shortlisted Entries3

Shortlisted Entries4

Shortlisted Entries5

Shortlisted Entries6

‘Design development – the process of designing’ is a design competition organized by archiol | artuminate. The competition mainly aims to understand the initial stage of design development. How does the process of designing evolve, the entire process from nothing to a habitable structure? What is your method of developing design?

The design project can be:
• situated in any location
• any type
• any scale

The competition expects you to:
• Show your design process through sketches, models, videos, photographs, or any other method you use to design.
• Explain your conceptual design development.

Basic Submission requirements:
• Presentation Board of the conceptual development – size: 30cmx30cm (minimum 2 boards, maximum 5 boards) – no. the presentation board.
• Text summary (min: 200 words, max: 500 words)

TIMELINE

All deadlines are 11:59 PM  UTC  (Coordinated Universal Time)

PRIZES

Recognition is the key to success for any design professional. Archiol is providing an opportunity to showcase your creativity at the global level. This opportunity is open to all design students and professionals

Certificates

Certificate of Achievement will be awarded to acknowledge the excellent performance of all Winners, Honourable Mentions, and Top 20 entries.

Exclusive Interview

The Top 3 Winners will get an exclusive interview in both – written and video formats.

Photos, interviews, and more information about the winners will be published on our website.

Publication

The Winners and Honorable Mentions and the top 20 will be published on Archiol’s website and other international architecture websites partnered with us.

The best entries will be featured in Archiol’s Yearbook.

All the participants will receive e-certificates.

REGISTRATION & SUBMISSION DETAILS

Participation
The competition is open to all Designers and Design students.

Submission Guidelines
• A zip folder with the presentation board (PDF. Format) & text summary (DOCS. Format).
• Please use the participation code as the name of the submission zip folder.
Submissions to be mailed at submit@archiol.com
• Subject: Design development – Your Participation Code
• Body: Link to the submission (Google drive/dropbox)

FEES DETAILS:

The registration period has been divided into 3 stages:

Early Birds (11th August 2021 – 31st August 2021) :

• Indian Nationals – ₹  500
• Foreign Nationals – $10

Registrations ( 1st September 2021 – 30th September 2021) :

• Indian Nationals – ₹ 800
• Foreign Nationals – $ 15

Late Registrations (1st October 2021 – 31st October 2021) :

• Indian Nationals – ₹ 1200
• Foreign Nationals – $ 20

Competition Website
https://www : archiol.com/archiol-competitions/design development 2021

Competition Organisers
Archiol (https://www .archiol.com/) & Artuminate (https://www .artuminate.com/)

Contact
●Queries: hello@artuminate.com
●Suggestions: media@archiol.com
Submission: submit@archiol.com

A4TC

The first edition of Archiol’s Architecture Thesis Competition.

Architecture thesis, the ultimate yet the preliminary test of the student being molded as an architect, the initial years that contribute into forging a designer that eventually formulates a collaboration of all the wisdom accumulated over the academic years, the inventive years which birth the composition of the incomprehensible ideas, known as thesis.

A4TC is an international architecture thesis competition that aims at promoting the amazing ideas nurtured with extensive research and thoughts. An acknowledgment of the efforts and creativity presented as the Architecture thesis by the future of architecture.

A competition designed to present your unimaginable and problem solving architectural ideas at a global scale.

A4TC is considering architectural thesis of the past decade (2011-2021).

TIMELINE:

Registration starts: 20th June 2021

Registration Deadline: 31st December 2021

Submission Deadline: 1st January  2022

Result Announcement: 15th February 2022

All deadlines are 11:59 PM UTC (Coordinated Universal Time)

AWARDS:

●TOP 3 WINNERS

  Total prize money of $1000 will be awarded to our top 3 winners.

$500- 1st Place

$300 -2nd Place

$200 – 3rd Place

  Certificate of Achievement

  Interview

Written format

Video format

Photos will be published on our platform

  Publication

Archiol

Artuminate

Platforms partnered with us

Selected best will be published in Archiol’s Yearbook

●HONORABLE MENTIONS

  Certificate of Achievement

  Publication

●SHORTLISTED ENTRIES

  Publication

●All the winners will receive E-certificate of Achievement

●All the participants will receive participation certificate.

ELIGIBILITY:

A4TC_2021 is open to architecture students/architects of all nationalities and institutions.

Thesis conducted in the calendar year 2011-2021 are eligible to participate

Undergraduate/Bachelors and Graduate/Masters Thesis

SUBMISSION:

Requirements

●Presentation Board (Max.2)
●Text (100-500 words)
●Format (Landscape, A1 / details in the submission kit)

Details

A zip folder that contains:
●Requirements folder.
Folder to be named: Participation Code
E-mail the sharing link to submission@archiol.com in the following format
Subject: A4TC_ registration code
Body: Link to the submission_______________________________

FEES DETAILS:

The registration period has been divided into 3 stages:

Stage 1: June 30th 2021 – July 31st 2021

• International registration: $20
• Indian registration:₹1400

Stage 2: August 1st 2021 – October 31st 2021

• International registration: $50
• Indian registration: ₹3600

Stage 3: November 1st 2021 – December 31st 2021

• International registration: $70
• Indian registration: ₹5000

COMPETITION LINK:

https://www.artuminate.com/annual-competition/a4tc_2021

CONTACT DETAILS:

hello@artuminate.com

media@archiol.com

Presentation skills are just as important as designing; one of the best mediums to present your architectural designs is through rendering. Architectural rendering aims to create life-like experiences of the buildings before they are built. Rendering aids the designer to convey ideas, an image that represents the designers’ imagination most realistically.

Archiol’s 2021 Render Challenge received 113, Scroll down to see the finest of architectural graphics from participants from all over the world.

• First Prize Winner_ Jiaman Xu, Ruiheng Zeng & Xiaoxin Wang (China)
• Second Prize Winner_ Antonella Marzi, Chiara Marzi & Marta Dituri (Italy)
• Third Prize Winner_ MiroslavNaskov (UK)

• Honorable Mention_ Niu Yifan (China)
• Honorable Mention_ ZHIXIANG XIA (China)
• Honorable Mention_ Tim CheC (US)

First Prize Winner_ JIAMAN XU, RUIHENG ZENG & XIAOXIN WANG

Forest fires have always been a desperate topic. In the case of severe forest fires, it is difficult to protect the lives of animals. The Amazon rainforest in 2019 and the Australian forest fires in 2020 caused devastating damage. Countless wild animals died in the fire or were displaced, causing people’s attention. It is precise because of these facts that the rescue of wild animals in fires needs to be widely recognized, and we need to provide them with a temporary shelter.

The refuge site is in New South Wales, Australia, which is hot and less rainy, which is one of the places prone to forest fires. When a fire occurs, the building uses the collected water to spray water through a spray device to form a low-temperature environment and attract animals to take refuge.

In order for our animal shelter to be self-sufficient to the greatest extent possible without human intervention, the operation of the building depends entirely on natural forces. According to realistic theories such as energy conversion, we set up rainwater and fog collection devices to solve the water problem of the building. The fog is converted into water and rainwater is collected to the water storage device at the bottom of the building, which can provide a continuous supply of the ecological environment inside the building. Provide water resources.

The refuge restores the original living environment of Australian animals as much as possible and ensures internal ecological diversity. In order to reduce the damage to the natural ecological environment, we spiral up the ecological layer to reduce the footprint of the building and recreate different ecological environments on the spirally rising ramps and natural environments that can provide sufficient refuge space for animals. Including the basic natural environment such as pools, swamps, grasslands, woods, etc., so that it is divided on each layer but connected to each other. For example, kangaroos like to run in the bushes, koalas will sleep on eucalyptus trees, wild dogs are used to hunting in the desert, platypuses usually hide in caves by the water, and ostriches with strong adaptability are suitable for most environments, such as open plains, forests or the desert doesn’t matter to them.

After the fire, the forest is slowly recovering, and the animals can return to the natural environment and rebuild their homes. Of course, the animals can continue to stay inside the building, and the food chain can maintain the relative balance of the ecological layer. Animals can enter and leave the building at any time to increase the sense of familiarity and belonging. Perhaps more lives can be saved the next time a fire occurs.

Second Prize Winner_ Antonella Marzi, Chiara Marzi & Marta Dituri 

ICE TOWERS

“A powerful and evocative gesture, a reinterpretation of the monument in a modern key.”

Our concept design is stemming from abstract ideas and shapes in inhospitable environments that become an architectural project. The site context aims to stimulate people’s thoughts on the consequences of human intervention in the living environment and adaptation to architecture.

Two crystalline monoliths emerge in the Arctic landscape. The building’s volume explores the sense as an ice sculpture on the rocks, by means of materials, textures, and colors.

As generated by tectonic forces, they guard and conceal an entire underground world. The towers rise from a submerged area, bursting through the surface, which integrating into the landscape – between the cliff and ocean waves.

Third Prize Winner_ MiroslavNaskov

The Forest House, nestled in the serene verdure of the Northern Italian countryside provides its visitors a unique experience. It is nonconformist yet resonates with the rawness of the nature around it.

The stilted housegives one the feeling of being lifted and placed in Nature’s lap, capturing breath taking views of the lush green clad mountains as well as the calm lake set between them.

The fluid design and soft volumes of the space add to the tranquillity of the space. The transparency provides panoramic views, inviting nature to become part of the space. Blurring the boundary between the interior and the exterior, the house and nature are in perfect symphony with each other.

The structure uses prefabricated 3D Printed structural elements. This not only eases the process of fabrication and significantly reduces cost but also has least impact on the natural environment.

Bespoke furniture designed for the space uses a similar language in design and materiality providing a wholesome yet luxurious experience in all.

Honorable Mention_ Niu Yifan

The globalized new coronavirus epidemic has thrown architectural problems with meaningful thinking to architects. Now in the post-epidemic era, how should architects rethink and define the contemporary attributes of physical public spaces? How to tap and strengthen the quality and value that cannot be replaced by virtual space, and make a targeted response in the design?

My work intends to show the current social situation in a warmer and more hopeful post-epidemic era. Through the architectural vision of the post-epidemic era. I designed a city with extremely prosperous traffic, because traffic is a prerequisite for urban development. I also designed a public transportation transfer station that can be rotated to facilitate the transfer and transfer of people. This rotation takes five minutes. When the turntable returns to its original position, the station will welcome the next wave of people, and people will meet in this regular and random space. The transmission lasts ten minutes. Then continue to spin for the next five minutes.

This work shows the sense of science and technology that people yearn for in the post-epidemic era and the warm connection between human. The sun shines into your sight through the movable buildings built under traffic, and everything is under the radiation of the sun, with a sense of post-modernity and technology. Everything is very peaceful and full of hope, expressing the prosperous industrial and social development after the epidemic.

Honorable Mention_ ZHIXIANG XIA

The image indicate an architecture which is driven by our minds. I’m always thinking about creating an architecture embodying our souls. The main structure of the architecture can grow and expand as our mind keeps developing. From bottom to top, every part of the structure shows the different stages of our mind, which in the image I visualize it by the people’s activities. And the connectivity is infinite and continuous; everything is intertwined and bounded together with an invisible force which can be described as the inner inspiration of every thought. Finally, architecture becomes an extension of our minds and it fully shows our inner space.

Honorable Mention_ Tim CheC

The distance between Mars and the Earth is approximately 225 million kilometers, making it the closest “livable” planet to the Earth.

Whether the movie” The Martian”, the landing news of the NASA’s “Perseverance”, or even the “SpaceX” company founded by Elon Musk, they all showed us the mysterious appearance of Mars. I am the person who love future technologies and science fiction pretty much. I can’t help but think, when I am 50 years old, will I be able to live on Mars at that time?

In this artwork, I tried to imagine what it might look like when people live on Mars in the future.

I took Transit-Oriented-Development (TOD ) as my main concept. The various facilities are connected by channels. The center of the facilities is a big rocket, which will carry the residents transport between different planets. The main residential facility large greenhouse buildings, which are filled with plants and oxygen. It creates a suitable space for people to live in. On the outer side, there are some Industrial facilities which can mine buried ice and create energy for residents to use.

Is it possible to build a self-sufficient city on Mars? How does it feel like when living on Mars? Are there other planets that can be explored by humans besides Mars? I am curious and excited in the technology and lifestyle of future. I hope through this artwork, everyone can share their imagination about the future living lifestyle.

Shortlisted Entries:

• Reality is merely an illusion _ Aditya Bhole

• Echoes of Nirvana_ Chang Wu

• In the middle of Mediterranean sea_ Patricija Gjugjaj

• Parallel 2077_ Lingfang Shao

• House on a Pavilion _ Tanvi Daga

• What is a vertical city _Xinyu Li

• _ Davide Cannone & Ilaria Impagnatiello

• The Blurred Forest _ HAOXIAN CAI

• Residential Energy Gathering Ring _ Wenqi Fan

• Non-To-Scale Megastructures: Where Man Meets the Machine _ Mohamad Alamin Younis
• Gaotai Residential _Bó Hú & Yixuan Yang

• “parts of a whole”_ Lingjing Shi
• A roundabout near the entrance of a small city_ Ioulianos Angelos Karantzios

• _ Shreyash Gupta
• _ Florian Mladek

Competition Jury:

• Randy Sovich, AIA

Randy M. Sovich, AIA, is co-editor of T3XTURE, an international architectural and design publication exploring texture, ornament, and pattern in a new architecture. He is the founding principal of R. M. Sovich Architecture, Inc., a socially-conscious practice located in Baltimore, Maryland, creating nurturing places for communities, the disenfranchised, and vulnerable populations.

• Nicole Cullinan

Nicole Cullinan is an Australian born European writer who has an established career in the architecture and arts industry. Sheenjoys the privilege of working with a number of prominent creatives, discovering what it is that makes their work unique. With a passion for place making and the built environment. She is a published academic author and an alumnus of The University of Melbourne.

With a side hustle in photography, her images have been featured on the National Gallery of Victoria and Heide Museum of Modern Art websites and socials. Recently she exhibited as part of the Photo 2021 collaboration with French artist JR at Federation Square. She believes the architects work can be more than what the eye can see; ‘allegoria dei sensi’. A trinity of function, form and feeling.

• Igor Neminov

Igor is an Art Director at Shimahara Visual, based in Los Angeles and has produced an innumerable amount of marketing and competition images for a some of LA’s award winning Architecture firms, which includes Morphosis, P-A-T-T-E-R-N-S, Tom Wiscombe and Frank Gehry Architects.
Igor is an award winning artist with over 10 years of professional design experience. He is also a gifted leader who is able to raise the artistic bar of everyone around him.

Organiser:

Artuminate : https://www.artuminate.com/

Winners Announcement: https://www.artuminate.com/competition-winners/render_challenge_2021

Contact:

• media@archiol.com
• hello@artuminate.com

Instagram:

• @archi_ol
• @architecture_competitions_

Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/archiol.fb

2 Second Prize Winner Antonella Marzi, Chiara Marzi Marta Dituri

1 First Prize Winner Jiaman Xu, Ruiheng Zeng Xiaoxin Wang

3 Third Prize Winner MiroslavNaskov

Honorable Mention ZHIXIANG XIA

Honorable Mention Tim CheC

Honorable Mention Niu Yifan

5 House on a Pavilion Tanvi Daga

3 In the middle of Mediterranean sea Patricija Gjugjaj

2 Echoes of Nirvana Chang Wu

4 Parallel 2077 Lingfang Shao

6 What is a vertical city Xinyu Li

1 Reality is merely an illusion Aditya Bhole

8 The Blurred Forest HAOXIAN CAI

7 Davide Cannone Ilaria Impagnatiello

10 Non-To-Scale Megastructures Where Man Meets the Machine Mohamad Alamin Younis

9 Residential Energy Gathering Ring Wenqi Fan

11 Gaotai Residential Bó Hú Yixuan Yang

13 A roundabout near the entrance of a small city Ioulianos Angelos

12 “parts of a whole” Lingjing Shi

14 Shreyash Gupta

15 Florian Mladek

Concrete in architecture is an architecture competition organized by archiol in association with artuminate. Concrete is an important material in the field of architecture and construction. What is the past, present, and future of concrete as a building material used in architectural construction?

The competition, Concrete in Architecture is looking for a graphical representation and essay submissions on the importance of concrete in architecture.

Competition Brief

The participants are free to choose the method of graphical representation. It could be through a design, a conceptual development or any kind unique approach.

Submission requirements:

• Presentation Board of the graphical representation – size: 30cmx30cm (minimum 1 boards, maximum 3 boards) – no. the presentation board.
• Text summary (min: 600 words, max: 1000 words)

Awards

In the designing field recognition is everything.  Archiol is providing a platform to showcase your creativity at a global level. The opportunity is open to all students and professionals. Take this challenge and explore your creativity, let the world witness your ideas.

Top 3 winners

• Exclusive interview on our platform
• Certificate of achievement
• Publication 

Top 10 Winners

• Publication
• E-certificate

The juries may announce more winning categories.

All participants will receive participation e-certificates

Participation

The competition is open to all Designers and Design students.

Submission Guidelines

• A zip folder with the presentation board (PDF. Format) & text summary (DOCS. Format).
• Please use the participation code as the name of the submission zip folder.

Submissions to be mailed at submit@archiol.com

• Subject: Concrete in architecture – Participation Code
• Body : Link to the submission (Google drive / dropbox)

Important dates and judgement criteria

Registration deadline: 12^th July 2021

Submission deadline: 15^th July 2021

Result announcement: 12^th August 2021

After completing the checkout, you will automatically receive a confirmation e-mail. If you can’t find the e-mail in your inbox, please check your spam folder.

Payments are handled by PayPal PayU Secure Payment Gateways. We accept all major currencies.
For any queries, feel free to contact us at _________________

 All deadlines are 11:59 PM UTC (Coordinated Universal Time).

Fees

Early Registrations ( 28^th March 2021 – 28th^th April 2021) : ₹ 500 (Indian Nationals) | $ 10 (Foreign Nationals)

Standard registrations (29^th April 2021 – 12^th July 2021) : ₹ 800 (Indian Nationals) | $ 15 (Foreign Nationals)

Competition Rules to follow:

• After completing the checkout you will receive a confirmation email from Archiol, In case you don’t receive an email check your spam folder.
• Participation code is to be created by individual following the instruction mentioned in the registration form.
• The official language of the competition is English. All correspondence with organizers must also be conducted in English.
• Archiol as the competition organiser , reserves the right to modify the competition schedule if deemed necessary.
• The registration fee is non-refundable.
• Contacting the Jury is strictly prohibited.
• Participants will be disqualified if any of the competition rules or submission requirements are not adhered to. Participation assumes acceptance of the regulati
• Archiol will have the full authority to publish and promote the material, always indicating the author, who will remain the owner of the idea of the project. By participating to the competition you allow Archiol to publish and diffuse the received material, and to modify it for adaptations to publication formats.
• Archiol can modify the contents of this document provided that the majority of participants can benefit from it. Possible changes will be communicated in time, therefore it is highly recommended to constantly check the website and Facebook/Instagram page.
• The decision of the Jury and Organizers shall be final and no requests for re-evaluation shall be entertained.

Covid-19 Pandemic has claimed over 35,00,000 deaths around the world. In the brutal heaviness of this pandemic, the number of infections outpaced the capacity of hospitals, assembling the frontline health workers to devote their lives for the safety and welfare of the community. Considered to be the backbone of any health system, these frontline workers have been the first line of defense during the pandemic and are still fighting it out to control and contain the virus. As a result of this ongoing battle, we have lost thousands of health workers who put their lives at stake unflinchingly to save millions of affected patients around the world.

To recognize the services and sacrifice by the frontline workers, Archasm invites all architecture students and professionals to design a memorial. The challenge is to design a prototype in your city/region as a mark of respect and tribute to the local warriors.

Memorials have persisted for centuries to establish empathy with past events which the society lived through or to honor the lives of the deceased. They serve for transferring information and will be comprehended as a contribution to the future for paying our tributes.

This sure seems like a premature time to build a memorial as several nations are still battling but the emotions, facts, and thoughts available during a calamity dissipate as it ebbs. The intensity of the moment might help us envision what such a memorial could be. It will help us recall the countless contributions of the health workers on the frontline and will aim to continue building a collective consciousness and provide lifelong gratitude to them.

Every community and culture were affected differently by Covid-19. In order to reflect this reality, the memorial should follow the culture and reflect the local context and the impact this pandemic has had. How can you turn this adversity into memorializing the commitment of the frontline workers?

Contemplate how we will come together or stay apart in the upcoming period. The solution does not have to be grandiose or even architectural, it can be basic and take any space or form that your community entails. The intervention should be emotional, powerful, poetic and can take any form/function as per the participant’s narrative. The memorial should take shape in an area footprint that can range from a minimum of 100 sq. meters to a maximum 1000 sq. meters.

AWARDS

Winning participants will receive prizes totaling INR 2,00,000 with the distribution as follows:

• First prize- INR 1,00,000/- + Certificate
• Second prize- INR 60,000/- + Certificate
• Third prize- INR 40,000/- + Certificate
• 10 Honorable mentions

REGISTRATION & TIMELINE

The competition is open to everyone in the world (architects, students, engineers etc.). You can participate individually or in a team. A team can have a maximum of three members only.

Standard registration: – 1^st June 2021 – 31^st July 2021

• International Participants: 60 EUR + Taxes (per team)
• Indian Participants: 1800 INR + Taxes (per team)

Late registration: – 1^st August 2021 – 30^th August 2021

• International Participants: 80 EUR + Taxes (per team)
• Indian Participants: 2100 INR + Taxes (per team)

Submission deadline: 31^st August 2021

Result: 28^th September 2021

DISCOUNT

15% discount for 5 teams and above.

OTHER DETAILS

Website: www.archasm.in

Facebook: www.facebook.com/atarchasm

Instagram: www.instagram.com/archasm_competitions/

This ideas competition is open to anyone who believes that one of IE’s innovative bachelor or master programs can help unlock one’s full potential. The general theme “Imagining Student Life at IE: Beyond the Vertical Campus” is the same for all applicants, but IE will consider applicants to each program in separate pools when judging the submissions.

The brief is intentionally broad. IE doesn’t want to constrain, contain, or impede an innovative idea with restrictive guidelines. Your submission can deal with anything from how we might reimagine the traditional student residence to tackling the issue of sustainability in all aspects of student life. Alternatively, you may focus on increasing the connection with the city, promoting student well-being or improving on-and off-campus mobility.

Above all, IE wants to see your creativity in action in a way that demonstrates your talent and way of thinking. IE wants you to consider how this hub of limitless potential can provide the most value to our students. Therefore, the competition is open to six IE’S programs : two Bachelor’s (BAS and BID) and four Master’s (MSID, MBARCH, GMRED and MRED. The documents to be submitted vary depending on which program you choose; download the competition’s brief to learn more about the papers required.

TIMELINE

13/05/2021 – Competition kick-off

28/06/2021 – Last day to sign up

30/06/2021 – Submission deadline

21/07/2021 –  Winners announced

PRIZES

> For those applying to IE’s  bachelors (BAS) – (BID) – There will be two (2) winners of the challenge under the Bachelor category. They will have the opportunity to take advantage of exclusive scholarships (up to 50%) to study at IE University (School of Architecture and Design)

> For those applying to IE’s masters (MSID) – (MBARCH) – (GMRED) – (MRED) – There will be four (4) winners of the challenge under the Masters category. Once the winners enroll in the program of their choice, they will entitle a Guaranteed Direct Award scholarship worth 40% of the program’s tuition.

JURY

Benedetta Tagliabue – Head Architect at Miralles Tagliabue embt and Chairman of Fundació Enric Miralles

David Goodman – Associate Dean and Director of the Bachelor in Architectural Studies at IE School of Architecture and Design

Edgar Gonzalez – Director of the bachelor in design at IE school of architecture and design

Margarita Chiclana – CEO UNEXUM Real Estate and Director of the Global Master in Real Estate Development at IE School of Architecture and Design

Christine Murray – Editor-in-chief, Founding Director and Owner at The Developer and Festival of Place

Jeffrey Sújar – Managing Partner Alternative Investments at Urbania International

MORE INFORMATION AND APPLICATION: Imagining student life at IE: beyond vertical campus 

CONTACT: info@iearchdesign-challenges.com

Simulaci-n Exterior01

Simulaci-n Interior0223

Simulaci-n Interior02

Simulaci-n Exterior02

IE Tower 1 April 2021-

Tower-2 (2)

Simulaci-n CincoTorres01

• Point in architecture is an architecture competition organized by archiol in association with artuminate.

• Primary elements in architecture are the basics of architecture design.

• This competition aims at exploring point as an architectural element throughthe ‘PERSPECTIVES’ in architecture.

• The competition, Point in Architecture, islooking for ‘PERSPECTIVES’ submissions that highlights point in architecture.

Competition Brief

Perspective submission.

Submission requirements:

• One image highlighting the Point (element) in architecture.
• A description of not more than 300 words.

Awards

In the designing field recognition is everything.  Archiol is providing a platform to showcase your creativity at a global level. The opportunity is open to all students and professionals. Take this challenge and explore your creativity, let the world witness your ideas.

Top 3 winners

• Certificate of achievement
• Publication 

Honourable Mention

• Certificate of achievement
• Publication 

Top 10 Winners

• Publication
• E-certificate

All participants will receive participation e-certificates

Participation

• Competition is open to all human beings, from every age and cultural background, working in groups or individually.
• Architects, Interior Designer and design students are perfectly suited for this competition.

Submission Guidelines

• A zip folder with the image (jpeg./ jpg.)
• A docx. File with description.
• Please use the participation code as the name of the submission zip folder.

Submissions to be mailed at submit@archiol.com

• Subject: Point_in_architecture – Participation Code
• Body : Link to the submission (Google drive / dropbox) / attachment.

Important dates and judgement criteria

Limited number of registrations: 200 only.

Register ASAP.

After completing the checkout, you will automatically receive a confirmation e-mail. If you can’t find the e-mail in your inbox, please check your spam folder.

Payments are handled by PayPal (International payments) PayU (Indian Payments)  Secure Payment Gateways. International payments are accepted in USD and Indian payments in INR.

For any queries, feel free to contact us at media@archiol.com or hello@artuminate.com

Fees

Standard Registration fees:

International Registrants: $10

Indian Registrants:  ₹500

Link to the Competition: https://www.archiol.com/archiol-competition/point_in_architecture

Organiser: https://www.archiol.com/  & https://www.artuminate.com/

Competition Rules to follow:

• After completing the checkout you will receive a confirmation email from Archiol, In case you don’t receive an email check your spam folder.
• Participation code is to be created by an individualfollowing the instruction mentioned in the registration form.
• The official language of the competition is English. All correspondence with organizers must also be conducted in English.
• Archiol as the competition organiser , reserves the right to modify the competition schedule if deemed necessary.
• The registration fee is non-refundable.
• Contacting the Jury is strictly prohibited.
• Participants will be disqualified if any of the competition rules or submission requirements are not adhered to. Participation assumes acceptance of the regulati
• Archiol will have the full authority to publish and promote the material, always indicating the author, who will remain the owner of the idea of the project. By participating in thecompetition you allow Archiol to publish and diffuse the received material, and to modify it for adaptations to publication formats.
• Archiol can modify the contents of this document provided that the majority of participants can benefit from it. Possible changes will be communicated in time, therefore it is highly recommended to constantly check the website and Facebook/Instagram page.
• The decision of the Jury and Organizers shall be final and no requests for re-evaluation shall be entertained.

As one of the most important trade exchange channels, the Silk Road was also a “cultural bridge” between Asia and Europe. The system has existed for over 2,000 years. The Silk Road represented a form of the global economy and spanned the Asian continent with widespread transmission of knowledge and ideas which had a profound impact on the culture. A network of mostly land but also sea trading routes, the Silk Road stretched from China to Korea and Japan in the east, Turkey and Italy in the west and linked China through Central Asia to India in the south. Trading activities along the Silk Road over many centuries facilitated the transmission of not just of goods but also ideas and culture, promoting a socio-cultural economy.

Today, we have diffused the idea of identity, culture, roots, and traditions, forgetting the ‘past’ and focusing on the idea of ‘future’ not realizing the damage that is being done to the ‘present’. As globalization is being embraced, the cultural identity of places is dying. This changing culture of architecture has deeply affected our symbolic beliefs and attitude.

Buildings inherently document the everyday life of a culture – the essence of a built-up environment is the manifestation of culture. They are repositories of the patterns of activity and movement of a society or people. Architecture reflects and influences culture, in a circle that arcs from art, food, dance, music, etc., and embracing values. The role of culture in promoting architectural identity seems essential and thus, architecture becomes a direct expression of culture.

At the intersection of the notions of culture and tourism, cultural centers increasingly stand out as the linkage between the exchange of values, habits, and social life. They are the most eternal means of expressing ourselves – of transferring ideas and values. Cultural Centers also play a vital role in retaining morals and beliefs for the community. The integration of architectural features, forms, and materials help imbibe the past as an active part of the future; a vision for the society in the coming years is just as important as retaining the values of old.

PRIZES

Prizes worth EUR 2500 are up for claim with the distribution as follows:

FIRST PRIZE: EUR 1200

SECOND PRIZE: EUR 800

THIRD PRIZE: EUR 500

Apart from the winners, the jury will select ’10 Editors’ Choices’ who will be featured on our website and several other international magazines and websites across the world. The winners and Editors’ Choices will be provided with an honorary certificate.

REGISTRATION &TIMELINE

The competition is open to everyone in the world (architects, students, engineers etc.). You can participate individually or in a team. A team can have a maximum of three members only.

Standard registration: – 1st May 2021 – 30th June2021

• For International participants: 60 EUR + Taxes (per team)
• For Indian participants: 1800 INR + Taxes (per team)

Late registration: – 1st July 2021 – 30th July 2021

• For International participants: 80 EUR + Taxes (per team)
• For Indian participants: 2100 INR + Taxes (per team)

Submission deadline: 31st July 2021

Result: 28th August 2021

DISCOUNT

Group discounts apply for a minimum of 5 teams from one particular architecture school/university as our initiative to promote more participation from students. Send us the following details at queries@switchcompetition.com to avail the offer.

OTHER DETAILS

Website: www.switchcompetition.com

Facebook: www.facebook.com/switchcompetition

Instagram: www.instagram.com/switch_competitions

But is this all to a prison? Can’t prison serve to be more than just a set up to punish the convicts?

Recidivism is not a very rare occurrence. It’s time to put out the question, why? Why do convicts go back to their old means as soon as they are released from the prison? Why are prisons failing to contribute to society?

Overcrowding prisons with poor living conditions and little opportunity for rehabilitation has resulted in high rates of recidivism. But is that all?

Prisons not only affect the lives of convicts, it affects the lives of victims, the lives of officers working their shifts day and night and it affects the society as a whole.

Can they be used as a facility to right the morals of the inmates? What can be done to lower recidivism number? How can architecture be used to solve this problem?

For a long time, these questions have been neglected. But it’s time to answer these questions. And hence,  ARCH8 wants to encourage architects and designers to think in this aspect and to come up with a solution for the same. It encourages them to understand the true purpose of a prison and the impact it can have on people’s life with the help of architecture.

OBJECTIVE

The goal is to design a medium security prison for a maximum capacity of 50 inmates. The concept should address recidivism, life of inmates and society overall. Participants are encouraged to explore how architecture of a place affects the behavior of people under its influence.

About site:

Participants have to choose a site of their choice because the site will greatly affect the architecture of the prison.

Choose a site with respect to any one of the below mentioned category:

1. In a densely populated area
2. In the outskirts of a city/town
3. In a completely distant area

REQUIREMENTS

1 A1 (landscape) composed with (at least):

• Design explanation (not more than 150 words).
• A plan
• A section
• A view
• Sheet code mentioned in the top right corner
• Submission must not include your Name, School, or Organization that gives away your identity.
• All dimensions should be imperial or in metric units.

JUDGING CRITERIA

• Originality
• Innovation
• Problem Resolving skills
• Presentation

REGISTRATION DETAILS

NOTE:

A team can have up to 3 members.

The amount is non-refundable.

Late registered participants will receive 5 extra days for submission.

TIMELINE

Registration deadline: 15th June 2021

Submission deadline: 20th June 2021

Result announcement: 30th June 2021

The following dates can be a subject of modification, if necessary.

SUBMIT AT

Submit in .jpeg format of file size not more than 5Mb.

Submit your entry at: hello@arch8.in

The subject of the mail: Your UCI (XXXXX)

Name of the file uploaded: Your UCI (XXXXX)

PRIZES

Total cash prize worth 15,000 INR.

Winner: Cash prize of INR 7500 + Acknowledgement on our website and social media + publication of the participants’ interview (Video) on website + 40% discount on your next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

1st Runner-up: Cash prize of INR 4500 + Acknowledgement on our website + publication of the participants’ interview (Video) on website + 30% discount on our next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

2nd Runner-up: Cash prize of INR 3000 + Acknowledgement on our website + publication of the participants’ interview (Video) on website + 20% discount on our next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

10 Honorable mentions: Acknowledgement on our website + 10% discount on our next architecture competition + certificate of achievement

Participation certificate for all the participants.

FAQs

1. What is the nature of the competition?

‘LOCK-UNLOCK’ is an open idea design competition challenge that is open for students, professionals & any individual with a creative mind.

2. Who can participate in the competition?

Architecture students, Architects, Interior Designer, Civil engineers & anyone with creativity can participate in the competition.

3. How many members can be a part of a team?

A team can have a maximum of 3 members. You can also participate individually.

4. Will every participant get a certificate of participation?

Yes, each registered participant will receive an e-certificate.

5. What should be done in case a payment mode is not available in a particular country?

In such a case, we request the participants to write about the issue at hello@arch8.in

to get other payment options. We will send all possible payment methods.

6. How will a team get its Unique Identification Code?

The Unique Identification Code ( UIC ) will be mailed to your registered e-mail address within 24 hrs after completing the registration process. There is only one UIC code for all the team members of a team.

7. What is the use of a Unique Identification Code?

All the participants are requested to use their UIC at the top right corner of your submission as it is your identity for the competition-related processes.

8. What to do if a participant does not receive the UIC after making payment?

In such cases, the participants are asked to mail their payment receipt hello@arch8.in.

9. Does the 150-word limit include legends & one-liners in the sheet?

No, the 150-word limit is for the proposal explanation only and it does not include the legends & one-liners on the sheet.

The cash prize of € 15, 000 will be distributed to the winning proposals selected by an international jury panel made of, among the others: Angelo Micheli (AMDL Circle), Rodrigo Duque Motta, Nicodemos Tsolakis (Kyriakos Tsolakis Architects), Lukas Rungger (noa*), Mario Cucinella, Dagur Eggertsson (Rintala Eggertsson Architects), Hesselberg Foged (Effekt).

> BRIEF

Some places may seem straight out of a fairy tale, bu they exist in the real world. In some places, a blend of legends, landscapes, memories, creates something that cannot be described in words: something humans perceive but cannot express, something science explains but does not own.

Rovaniemi is one of those places.

Capital of Finnish Lapland, Rovaniemi is one of the few cities in the world located at a few kilometres from the Arctic Circle: legacy of people with colourful clothes and special traditions, reindeer farmers and sleigh builders. Rovaniemi is a place made of snow, perpetual dawns and dusks, and it is home to the dancing lights that shine in the sky during cold winter nights – the Aurora Borealis.

Home to Santa Claus- the Scandinavian myth that conquered the world through tales and folklore, the town of Rovaniemi had been considered inaccessible and remote for most of its history. Until last century, when it became the destination for visitors and tourists, who wanted to feel its magic and see the fascinating Northern Lights. Today Rovaniemi is no longer a prerogative of expert travellers and explorers, and new hospitality models are necessary in order to protect the remote identity of this land. An identity that is characterized by primitive beauty and harmony, and inaccessibility and the absence of humans greatly contributed to its shaping.

How can we make places like this accessible, as inaccessibility is a key part of their charm? What kind of accommodation facilities can combine hospitality and unspoilt nature?

This is the challenge of Arctic Hotel, the competition organized by YAC and Rovaniemi to create a place where people can experience the most authentic North, respecting its isolation and magic.

On Ounasvaara Hill, overlooking one of the most remote bases ever built, architects will have the opportunity to imagine a structure that blends with the forest, the snow and the sky. A place where visitors can find shelter from the freezing temperatures of the Arctic Circle, gather around a fire, and enjoy the rarest and most mysterious spectacle of nature: the Aurora Borealis.

> JURY

• Angelo Micheli (AMDL Circle)
• Rodrigo Duque Motta
• Nicodemos Tsolakis (Kyriakos Tsolakis Architects)
• Lukas Rungger (noa*)
• Mario Cucinella
• Dagur Eggertsson (Rintala Eggertsson Architects)
• Hesselberg Foged (Effekt Architects)
• Tarja Outila (University of Oulu)
• Ari Vuorentausta (Lapland Hotels)
• Ulla-Kirsikka Vainio (Municipality of Rovaniemi)
• Sanna Kärkkäinen (Visit Rovaniemi)

> PRIZES

1^st  PRIZE 8.000 €

2^nd   PRIZE 4.000 €

3^rd  PRIZE  2.000 €

2 GOLD MENTIONS  500 €  each

10 HONORABLE MENTIONS

30 FINALISTS

> CALENDAR

12/04/2021  “early bird” registrations-  start

16/05/2021  (h 23.59 GMT) “early bird”registrations- end

17/05/2021   “standard”registrations-   start

13/06/2021(h 23.59 GMT) “standard” registrations- end

14/06/2021 “late” registrations- – start

11/07/2021  (h 23.59 GMT) “late” registrations- end

14/07/2021  (h 12.00- midday- GMT) Materials submission deadline

More information at: www.youngarchitectscompetitions.com

Contact: yac@yac-ltd.com

We are facing a miracle, a real miracle, a unique landscape and changeable with every season.

This landscape is born of two rivers, Parnaíba and Preguiças. They drag sand and sediment from the interior of the continent to the Atlantic Ocean,
this sediment are deposited on the 70 kilometres of coastline. Durin dry season, above all, in the months of October and November, the north-east
wind transports the sand up to 48 kilometresin land from the earth, sculpting crescent-shaped dunes that reach 39 metres height and extend as far as
the eye can see.

Under bird´s eye view, this place, with the name “Lencços Maranhenses”,refers to the “Sabanas de Maranha” o “Maranha sheets”.

Every Year, when the rainy season comes, between Junary and June new gaps are born. In July they reach their highest level. The also becomeinterconenected when rivers cross the dunes, for example, the Black river.

It may seem like a desert landscape, but between dunes and water we can find two small communities, of about 90 people, who very their routines with the seasons: during the dry season, they are dedicated to breeding of animals and cultivation and with the rains they travel to the coast to dedicate themselves to fishing.

WHAT ARE WE DOING HERE?

Faced with the constant and devastating advancement of the so-called expansive tourism, we believe that architecture can serve as a restorative
/ integrating element, being of vital importance and relevance so that both realities can coexist. The architecture will play a fundamental role, being able to be the way of relationship between the culture belonging to the area and the tourists coming from other places in the world like America or Europe.

Therefore, we are in one of the most characteristic landscapes of Brazil.which is visited every year by thousands of tourists with the intention of
impregnating with the country´s nature.Expansive tourism can generate economic advantages and environmental disadvantages. First of all, the architecture must be created from moderation and respect for nature, which allows us to know all the essential aspects of Brazilian culture, without the need to generate changes in it, as has happened in the Mediterranean after the arrival of tourists from northern Europe.

That is why at this site it is propossed to give a solution to a real problem that will go increase every day. And for this there os only one possible way,the union of three basic concepts.

LOCATION – VISION FROM SPACE

North of the Maranhao region, we find a desert paradise in constant transformation because of rains and winds. The implementation of a project in a changing area may seem quite complicated,but it is precisely, in the difficulties where it rewards ingenuity.

That is why the new competition will be located in this peculiar location.A changing place, where the landscape and its integrative concept is themost important thing to take precedence in the project.

PROGRAM

The Kitesurf School Lençóis Maranhenses competition presents a space where you can experience the relationship between sport, nature and
human beings.

The project should highlight the uniqueness of the place and become a space where there is a respect for the landscape, culture and atmosphere of the place.This last point is important as the place arrives tourists from Europe or America constantly interested in knowing the place and in fact it is such an inaccessible place that it is normal to make small camping in the area.That is why this kitesurfing school has to allow itinerant accommodation of people but without excessive contamination of the place.

Therefore, the proposed building should consider combining all these options. Tourists who arrive share experiences with the nature. A unique and unforgettable experience to get to know this amazing place.

In these bases, the designer himself will define the m² of each area,according to the unique idea he proposes. All ideas proposed will bevalid. The project may be on earth, in the sky, buried or flying. It can be developed at the choice of the designer; it can be a compact module or be a dispersion of small buildings that solve the problem.

The competition programme proposes the following spaces, which can be expanded, simplified and manipulated by the contestant as it sees fit but justified:

– Personal area. Area dedicated to the work of 2 or 3 people who will put visitors first, give them kitesurfing instructions or the necessary material to practice the sports.

– Food and rest area. This area can be shared, linked or even the same as the rest area if you want. It will be small accommodations for up to 10 people who come to practice the sport and want to have this experience more than 1 day.

– Toilet area. The minimum and indispensable unit needed to do so.Bathroom, shower and toilet. It is not intended to place a battery of small toilets as the minimum possible impact and the minimum ecological footprint possible are required.

-Storage area: All material needed for sports must be stored. This warehouse may be indoors or outdoors, covered or not. Depends on the idea of the
designer.

As mentioned above, the surface of the proposal is free and these spaces can be closed, opened or semi-open depending on the intentions of each project, and can be set to any dimension of the enclave. Hence, there are no restrictions that can influence the decisions each participant makes.The freedom of the project is absolute, this contest proposes that the participant research the landscape and the different forms of intervention in it. Study boundaries, scales, views, cross-looking,horizons, accesses. It’s the keys to follow.

* Participants can suggest new areas not proposed in this document, as wellas eliminate or combine some of those already mentioned.

Lençóis Maranhenses National Park
Brazil country
Maranhão Division
Subdivision: North Maranhense
Nearby city: Barreirinhas
Area: 156,584 ha
Latitude: 2 ° 33 ’55’ ’S
Longitude: 42 ° 58 ’50’ ’W

reTHINK!NG philosophy

reTHINKING Team proposes contests far from the pessimism, with high doses of freshness and joy, restless and expansive. Definitively, it aims to stimulate
and shake the architects heads who seem to be asleep and restore dignity to the profession. Being optimistic over all.

The proposed competitions will be focused on 8 concepts which we think there is much to investigate and propose by architects.

We understand that architecture can not be classified, as a single project reflects on various concepts relevant to contemporary culture, but enhance several of these main research topics.

MAIN CONCEPTS

NATURE

Definitely Nature does not exist. We have just digitalized the last squared meter of the planet and we have it already inside our artificial (artificializador) pocket.
Landscapes made to be used, where function and architecture show up at the same time their natural and artificial condition.

Architecture and context. Establishing both terms would be again a duality, some kind of halfway between architecture and its context, an inevitable addition of both of them due to its mutual influence. It becomes a singular ecology, among which architecture and what existed before are discovered. Architecture adds as a landscape, it is landscape and not object.

paisaje y no objeto

ECOLOGY

We oppose to the aged and nostalgic ecology (freezer of landscapes,territories and environments), through an audacious ecology; re-qualifying versus re-formulating. Based not anymore in a fearful and defensive nonintervention, but in a non-impositive one, a qualifying intervention in synergy with the environment, and with technology too. Not only optimistic but “positiv-istic”.

An ecology where sustainability means interaction.
Where nature is also artificiality.
Where landscape is topography.
Where energy is information and technology is transportation
Where development is recycling and evolution is genetic.
Where environment is field.
Where conservation implies always intervention.

SCALE

Scale is not measurement, nor dimension, but capacity for relationship. In the same way that the dynamic systems that govern our universe (and the complex geometries of the structures associated with them) promote possible “to-scale” zoom relationships, these open configurations that are not associated with any scale are of interest here: o better, that they alter the idea of scale – of scale, not of size, as Federico Soriano would point out- thus referring to the very diffuse nature of the contemporary environment/ resonating flexibly and without prejudice with and among its surprising -and ambiguous – manifestations.

Action and effect of an architecture that does not distinguish limits, that dissolves. All the space of this architecture would be intermediate space “between”.

DELIVERY CONTENT RULES OF PRESENTATION

Participants must submit a single A1 (59,4 x 84,1 cm) any orientation is accepted. The registration code (order number, #0000 or #00000) obtained at the time of registration must appear at the upper right
corner. Remember checking the spam inbox. You must also choose a Slogan or title for your project which can be placed anywhere. Panels delivered without the code and slogan can be excluded from the competition.

THE SUBMISSION WILL BE ONLINE THROUGH RETHINKING WEBSITE: www.rethinkingcompetitions.com. DELIVERY IS NOT ALLOWED THROUGH WETRANSFER OR VIA EMAIL UNLESS THE RETHINKING TEAM SPECIFIES IT.

Once confirmed the payment, the participant will receive a document named “Welcome/Bienvenidos”. The way of naming each file will be explained here as well as how to submit your proposal. Remember checking the spam box.

Files must be zipped in only one .ZIP file with all the required documents. Files must be less than 8 MB.

The information included in the panels will be the necessary to understand the project, each participant can choose: graphic representations, model pictures, perspectives, sketches, renderings, texts,etc. Models can not be delivered.

The jury will evaluate the quality of architectural design and its clear presentation and general composition. Shall not be required, although it will be appreciated, to solve the project construction or structural systems.

The project must be understood mainly through the artwork. In the sheet may be included text, although the presence of a large amount is not recommended. You can use either English or Spanish. The scale can be chosen by the participants.

REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION TO BE DELIVERED:

The following documentation is required:
1. Competition anonymous panel (.jpg) (maximum 8Mb)
2. Competition named panel (.jpg) (maximum 8Mb)
3. Identification FormTeam (.pdf) Team description. This file will be available
by direct download in the document “Welcome / Bienvenidos”.
4. Abstract in 90 words (.doc)
5. Team photograph (.jpg)
6. Representative image (.jpg)
7. Social media Panel (.jpg) (maximum 1Mb)
This documentation will be named as described in the “Welcome-Bienvenidos”
file and it will have a maximum of 40 MB in total in the delivered .ZIP file.

WHO CAN PARTICIPATE?

All students and architects or related professions anywhere in the world can participate in the contest. Participation can be individual or in groups, being eight (8) the maximum number of members. Team members can be from all disciplines (artists, philosophers, photographers, etc.),without being necessary, although advisable, the presence of an architect or architecture student. It is allowed that members are from different universities and countries.

The price of registration is the price that each participating team much pay, regardless of the number of members.In case that one team or participant wants to submit more than one proposal for the same competition must register twice (or as many as want to present projects) paying the appropriate fee each time.

Under no circumstances should the participation of any juror, or anyone how have a professional relationship with any of the jury will be accepted.

PRIZES

The amount of 5,000 € will be distributed as follows:
First Prize：3.500 € (1.500 € + 2.000 € Programs MArchValencia *)
Second prize：  1000 €
Third Prize：500 €+ 10 Honourable Mentions    No economic prize

In addition the rethinking team is committed to the dissemination of the
project through:
• Publishing in blogs / architecture websites
• Publication in reTHINKING media

* The winner of € 2000 Grant for Master’s degree MArch Valencia program of the School of Architecture and Polytechnic of the European University of Valencia will be chosen by Fran Silvestre between the prizes and accesits

All the sponsors of the competition will be a key support in the development of the competition. The jury will be prestigious and will be composed of professionals from the world of architecture.

** Depending on the country of tax residence of the winners, the cash prize may be subject to withholdings or tax payments corresponding to the legislation of the country itself. Like the MArch scholarship, it will have the due deductions in the event that they are given.

JURY

Pablo Camarasa – MArch Investigation
Vicent Molins – Director of Agència Districte
Carmen Moreno Álvarez – Phd Architect
Ana Gea y Victor Palau – Team of Gràffica.info

*All jury members have shown a willingness to be present at the voting process where the winners will be selected, however their participation is subject to their professional and educative commitments with their own studies and projects.

The Jury will know the Provisional List of admitted proposals issued by the reTHINKING, contests and will decide on possible incidents that may have occurred. They will then examine the proposals anonymously. The jury reserves the right to declare null and void any of the prizes. Likewise, it may award ex aequo et bono some ot them, distributing in this case the total amount equally. In the event that the jury declares any prize void, these will not be distributed among the other winners.

CALENDAR

APRIL 5TH 2021                                            Early registration starts
MAY 4TH 2021                                                 Early registration ends
MAY 5TH 2021                                           Regular registration starts
MAY 25TH 2021                                         Regular registrations ends
MAY 26TH 2021                                                Late registration starts
JUNE 15TH 2021                               Late registration and FAQ ends
JUNE 15TH 2021
18:00 h GMT + 1:00                                            Submission deadline*
JUNE 17TH 2021                                Padmission List publication in
reTHINKING official website **
JUNE 17TH – JULY 8TH 2021                              Evaluation process
JULY 2021              Winners announcement and media disclo-sure.

The results will be published in our website and Social media. It will also be communicated individually to each of the contestants or teams that have been awarded, which may be before or after their online publication.

* If the documentation is received after the deadline, the project will be disqualified.

** The website is www.rethinkingcompetitions.com. The list will be also published on Rethinking official facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/reTHINKINGAC/).

INSCRIPTION

Inscription periods will depend on the competition publication and will be divided as follows:
Periodo Inscripción                      Individual            Inscripción Grupal(2-8 personas)
Temprana                                                35 € *                                        45 € *
Regular                                                     45 € *                                        60 € *
Avanzada                                                 65 € *                                         85 € *

*+21% IVA. Fulfilling an “Early”, “Regular” or “Advanced” registration does not affect submission deadline.

Before making the inscription one member of the team must register on our website. After completing the registration form, you will receive an email with your password and the registration code you will need for your panels (Order: #0000 or #00000). It’s important to keep this registration code, it will allow your team to access the intranet where you’ll be able to access your registration.

Once registered you will have to make the inscription through our website:http://rethinkingcompetitions.com/ by paying the current fee. The submitting
instructions will be sent once we receive the payment. After 5 days since payment reTHINKING will not make refunds. Refunds costs shall be paid by contestants and never througt the platform. Inscription fees will not be kept for future competitions.

The registration of several people on the individual registration mode will be a reason for disqualification.

DISCOUNTS

It is possible to lower the price of the entries to any Rethinking competition registering multiple teams simultaneously. If you are a teacher and want to use our competition as an exercise you can take advantage of discounts and involve the largest number of teams. For every 10 teams will save 30% of the total enrollment.

* For the applicable discount teams should be registered at the same time. The payment will be the total of all the teams.

PAYMENT

The payment method will be the one that best suits the team, considering that payments made by Bank transfer must have as a concept the code team. If we receive a payment that is not properly identified we won’t be able to relate it to your team and your participation will not be confirmed until you provide a proof of payment.

Bank Deposit the account data will be provided when choosing this option. Once the registration fee is paid it will not be refunded in any case.

Registration dates are subject to the receipt of payments, not the time of issue.

Any type of management fees and / or bank charges will be borne by the participant.

Credit or Debit Cards: All card payments will be handled by PayPal to ensure data security. Rethinking not have access to your card details. The inscription will be received instantly.

Tarjeta de crédito: reTHINKING no tendrá acceso a los datos de vuestra tarjeta. La inscripción será recibida de forma instantánea.
Pay-Pal: Your registration will be received instantly.

All payments made by bank transfer must have the registration code in the subject and the account holder must be the person who is registered in the contest.

DOCUMENTS

The following information is available for download on the website of reTHINK!NG:

Complete rules in ENGLISH and in SPANISH
Graphic Material
Site Photos
Site .dwg drawing
Communication Material, Competition’s trailer and Poster

All the information is available for everyone in our website, no need for registration for consult it.

Participants will create their own graphic documents or use materials from other sources, leaving the team Rethinking exempt from any liability for infringement of copyright or other intellectual property rights.

FAQ

From the start date until the deadline, all those questions that help to better understand the project and its objectives as well as on the functioning of competition may be proposed.
The questions not resolved in these rules or in the “FAQ” section of our website should be done through reTHINKING page on Facebook, which can be accessed from the top menu of any page our website. Any question must be sent to contact@rethinkingcompetitions.com.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Rethinking team will provide to each jury member a document where the basic concepts which its own vision of the architecture is based on.
The jury, once understood the profile and concerns of Rethink!NG,will give their personal assessment based on their knowledge and experience on the architectural project.

The jury will be revising all deliveries, where finally, it was particularly valued the reTHINK!NG spirit and the adequacy of the response to the problem and achieved goals, reviewing the response that each project gives to each concept, methodology and research accomplished.In this latest round finalists , honorable mentions and the winners will be designated .

The jury reserves the right to award proposals that do not comply any of the parameters of these rules as long as it represents an improvement in the project.

NTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The authors of all the works presented have the rights recognized in the Real Decreto Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, of 12 April, approving the revised text of the Law on Intellectual Property, regularizing, clarifying and harmonizing intellectual property existing legislation on the subject.

Once submitted, the material will be given to rethinking for future publications and promotions of the contest. If used for other purposes, the authors retain all rights to their proposals.

The information submitted may be edited by the reTHINKING team to adapt it for publications, but never altering the original project. The use of graphic images and copying architectural projects by any contestant will be grounds for immediate disqualification and future complaints of copying intellectual property will be supported by the participant.

NOTAS

reTHINK!NG reserves the right to make any changes in the competition rules (dates, deadlines, requirements, etc.) as long as these benefit the majority of participants and improving the competition. Any modification of the bases will be announced on the official website of reTHINKING on Facebook, remain the responsibility of the participants to visit frequently.

The project proposed here is fictitious and will not be built. The material provided to participants may have been modified by reTHINKING to improve the project conditions, so that drawings, photographs and other documentation may not match reality.

The project proposed here is fictitious and will not be built. The material provided to participants may have been modified by reTHINKING to improve the project conditions, so that drawings, photographs and other documentation may not match reality.

reTHINK!NG is only responsible for receiving, organization and evaluation of the contest, as well as assistance to participants in the
development of competition, therefore, reTHINK!NG has no vote in regard to the decision of the winners that the jury deems appropriate.

The submission of the application for registration implies the acceptance of these rule.

Don’t forget to follow us in our social networks to be up to date of all our news!
Subscribe to our NEWSLETTER !!!!

Contact

www.reTHINKing competitions.com
| +34 955 54 29 92 | +34 627 706 234 |
| contact@rethinkingcompetitions.com |
| calle josé laguillo 27 bloque 7 local 1B | Sevilla 41003

6

5

3

7

2

4

1

9

8

xV0UWUw8

Considering the impacts of global population shifts, advanced materials and building techniques, as well as marketplaces like Airbnb and the rise of co-housing, tiny homes.

Propose a single family home. Define how residents interact with the proposed design in graphical representation.

Submission requirements:

• Presentation Board of the proposed design – size: 30cmx30cm (minimum 2 boards, maximum 5 boards) – no. the presentation board.
• Text summary (min: 200 words, max: 500 words)

Awards

Recognition is the key to success for any design professional. Archiol is providing an opportunity to showcase your creativity at global level.  This opportunity is open to all design students and professionals

Certificates

Certificate of Achievement will be awarded to acknowledge the excellent performance of all Winners, Honourable Mentions and Top 20 entries.

Exclusive Interview

The Top 3 Winners will get an exclusive interview in both – written and video formats.

Photos, interview, and more information about the winners will be published on our website.

Publication

The Winners and Honorable Mentions and the the top 20  will be published on the Archiol’s website and other international architecture websites partnered with us.

The best entries will be featured in Archiol’s Ezine  and Archiol’s Yearbook.

All the participants will receive e-certificates.

Participation

The competition is open to all Designers and Design students.

Submission Guidelines

• A zip folder with the presentation board (PDF. Format) & text summary (DOCS. Format).
• Please use the participation code as the name of the submission zip folder.

Submissions to be mailed at submit@archiol.com

• Subject: Home_2021 – Participation Code
• Body : Link to the submission (Google drive / dropbox)

Important dates and judgement criteria

Registrations Deadline : 28th July 2021
Submissions Deadline : 5th August 2021
Results announcement : : 5th September 2021
All deadlines are 11:59 PM UTC (Coordinated Universal Time).

Fees

Early Birds  | 28th March 2021 – 10th April 2021

• Indian Registration : INR 500
• International Registrations : USD 10

Standard Registrations | 11th April 2021 – 11th June 2021

• Indian Registration : INR 800
• International Registrations : USD 15

Late registrations | 12th June 2021 – 28th July 2021

• Indian Registration : INR 1200
• International Registrations : USD 20

Jury

To be announced.

Competition Website

https://www.archiol.com/archiol-competitions/home_2121_future_architecture

Competition Organisers

Archiol (https://www.archiol.com/) & Artuminate (https://www.artuminate.com/)